Paper detail

Cache Bypassing for Machine Learning Algorithms

Graphics Processing Units (GPUs) were once used solely for graphical computation tasks but with the increase in the use of machine learning applications, the use of GPUs to perform general-purpose computing has increased in the last few years. GPUs employ a massive amount of threads, that in turn achieve a high amount of parallelism, to perform tasks. Though GPUs have a high amount of computation power, they face the problem of cache contention due to the SIMT model that they use. A solution to this problem is called "cache bypassing". This paper presents a predictive model that analyzes the access patterns of various machine learning algorithms and determines whether certain data should be stored in the cache or not. It presents insights on how well each model performs on different datasets and also shows how minimizing the size of each model will affect its performance The performance of most of the models were found to be around 90% with KNN performing the best but not with the smallest size. We further increase the features by splitting the addresses into chunks of 4 bytes. We observe that this increased the performance of the neural network substantially and increased the accuracy to 99.9% with three neurons.

preprint2021arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.