Paper detail

Ca II Triplet Spectroscopy of Small Magellanic Cloud Red Giants. VI. Analysis of chemical properties of the Main Body

We derived radial velocities and CaT metallicity of more than 150 red giants stars in six SMC star clusters and their surrounding fields, with the instrument GMOS on GEMINI-S. The mean cluster radial velocity and metallicity were obtained with mean errors of 2.2 km\,s$^{-1}$ and 0.03 dex, while the mean field metallicities have a mean error of 0.13 dex. We add this information to that available for another 51 clusters and 30 fields with CaT metallicities on the same scale. Using this expanded sample we analize the chemical properties of the SMC Main Body, defined as the inner 3.4 degrees in semimajor axis. We found a high probability that the metallicity distribution of the Main Body clusters is bimodal with a metal-rich and a metal-poor cluster group, having mean metallicities with a dispersion of $μ= -0.80$, $σ= 0.06$ and $μ= -1.15$, $σ= 0.10$ dex, respectively. On the other hand, Main Body field stars show a unimodal metallicity distribution peaking at $[Fe/H] \sim -1$ and dispersion of $0.3$. Neither metal-rich nor metal-poor clusters present a metallicity gradient. However the full Main Body cluster sample and field stars have a negative metallicity gradient consistent with each other, but the one corresponding to clusters has a large error due to the large metallicity dispersion present in the clusters studied in that region. Metal-rich clusters present a clear age-metallicity relation, while metal-poor clusters present no chemical enrichment throughout the life of the galaxy. We present observational evidence that the chemical enrichment is complex in the SMC Main Body. Two cluster groups with potential different origins could be coexisting in the Main Body. More data with precise and homogeneous metallicities and distances are needed and dynamical simulations are required to understand possible different origins for the two possible cluster groups.

preprint2022arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access8 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.