Paper detail

$C^{r}-$prevalence of stable ergodicity for a class of partially hyperbolic systems

We prove that for $r \in \mathbb{N}_{\geq 2} \cup \{\infty\}$, for any dynamically coherent, center bunched and strongly pinched volume preserving $C^r$ partially hyperbolic diffeomorphism $f \colon X \to X$, if either (1) its center foliation is uniformly compact, or (2) its center-stable and center-unstable foliations are of class $C^1$, then there exists a $C^1$-open neighbourhood of $f$ in ${\rm Diff}^r(X,\mathrm{Vol})$, in which stable ergodicity is $C^r$-prevalent in Kolmogorov's sense. In particular, we verify Pugh-Shub's stable ergodicity conjecture in this region. This also provides the first result that verifies the prevalence of stable ergodicity in the measure-theoretical sense. Our theorem applies to a large class of algebraic systems. As applications, we give affirmative answers in the strongly pinched region to: 1. an open question of Pugh-Shub in \cite{PS}; 2. a generic version of an open question of Hirsch-Pugh-Shub in \cite{HPS}; and 3. a generic version of an open question of Pugh-Shub in \cite{HPS}.

preprint2020arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.