Paper detail

C-P Map: A Novel Evaluation Toolkit for Speaker Verification

Evaluation trials are used to probe performance of automatic speaker verification (ASV) systems. In spite of the clear importance and impact, evaluation trials have not been seriously treated in research and engineering practice. This paper firstly presents a theoretical analysis on evaluation trials and highlights potential bias with the most popular cross-pairing approach used in trials design. To interpret and settle this problem, we define the concept of trial config and C-P map derived from it. The C-P map measures the performance of an ASV system on various trial configs in a 2-dimensional map. On the map, each location represents a particular trial config and its corresponding color represents the system performance. Experiments conducted on representative ASV systems show that the proposed C-P map offers a powerful evaluation toolkit for ASV performance analysis and comparison. The source code for C-P map has been release at https://gitlab.com/csltstu/sunine.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.