Paper detail

$Λ_c^+$ fragmentation functions from pQCD approach and the Suzuki model

Through data analysis, we present new sets of nonperturbative fragmentation functions (FFs) for $Λ_c^+$ baryon both at leading and next-to-leading order (NLO) and, for the first time, at next-to-next-to-leading order (NNLO) in the minimal subtraction factorization scheme with five massless quarks. The FFs are determined by fitting all available data of inclusive single $Λ_c^+$ baryon production in $e^+e^-$ annihilation taken by the OPAL Collaboration at CERN LEP1 and Belle Collaboration at KEKB. We also estimate the uncertainties in the $Λ_c^+$ FFs as well as in the corresponding observables. In a completely different approach based on the Suzuki model, we will theoretically calculate the $Λ_c^+$ FF from charm quark and present our result at leading order perturbative QCD framework. A comparison confirms a good consistency between both approaches. We will also apply the $Λ_c^+$ FFs to make theoretical predictions for the energy distribution of $Λ_c^+$ produced through the top quark decay, to be measured at the CERN LHC.

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.