Paper detail

$Λ_{c}^{+}$ decays at BESIII

BESIII has made great progress in taking data which is the largest data samples near the $Λ_{c}^{+}\barΛ_{c}^{-}$ threshold. We have measured the branching fraction of $Λ_{c}^{+}\to nπ^{+}$ to be $(6.6\pm 1.2_{\mathrm{stat.}}\pm 0.4_{\mathrm{syst.}})\times 10^{-4}$ with the statistical significance of 7.3 $σ$ firstly using $3.9\mathrm{fb}^{-1}$ $e^{+}e^{-}$ collision collected with BESIII detector at six center-of-mass energies between 4.612 and 4.699 GeV. With the result of the branching fraction of $Λ_{c}^{+}\to pπ^{0}$ from Belle, the ratio of the branching fractions between $Λ_{c}^{+}\to nπ^{+}$ and $Λ_{c}^{+}\to pπ^{0}$ is measured to be larger than 7.2 at 90% confidence level. The branching fractions of $Λ_{c}^{+}\to Λπ^{+}$ and $Λ_{c}^{+}\to Σ^{0} π^{+}$ are measured to be $(1.31\pm 0.08_{\mathrm{stat.}}\pm 0.05_{\mathrm{syst.}})\times 10^{-2}$ and $(1.22\pm 0.08_{\mathrm{stat.}}\pm 0.07_{\mathrm{syst.}})\times 10^{-2}$, respectively, which are consistent with previous BESIII results. More results of $Λ_{c}^{+}$ decays will be published with better precision this year using $6.4\mathrm{fb}^{-1}$ $e^{+}e^{-}$ collision data samples between 4.600 and 4.946 GeV.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Authors

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.