Bypassing Erdős' Girth Conjecture: Hybrid Stretch and Sourcewise Spanners

preprint2014arXivOpen access

Abstract

An (α,β)(α,β)-spanner of an nn-vertex graph G=(V,E)G=(V,E) is a subgraph HH of GG satisfying that dist(u,v,H)≤α⋅dist(u,v,G)+βdist(u, v, H) \leq α\cdot dist(u, v, G)+β for every pair (u,v)∈V×V(u, v)\in V \times V, where dist(u,v,G′)dist(u,v,G') denotes the distance between uu and vv in G′⊆GG' \subseteq G. It is known that for every integer k≥1k \geq 1, every graph GG has a polynomially constructible (2k−1,0)(2k-1,0)-spanner of size O(n1+1/k)O(n^{1+1/k}). This size-stretch bound is essentially optimal by the girth conjecture. It is therefore intriguing to ask if one can "bypass" the conjecture by settling for a multiplicative stretch of 2k−12k-1 only for \emph{neighboring} vertex pairs, while maintaining a strictly \emph{better} multiplicative stretch for the rest of the pairs. We answer this question in the affirmative and introduce the notion of \emph{kk-hybrid spanners}, in which non neighboring vertex pairs enjoy a \emph{multiplicative} kk-stretch and the neighboring vertex pairs enjoy a \emph{multiplicative} (2k−1)(2k-1) stretch (hence, tight by the conjecture). We show that for every unweighted nn-vertex graph GG with mm edges, there is a (polynomially constructible) kk-hybrid spanner with O(k2⋅n1+1/k)O(k^2 \cdot n^{1+1/k}) edges. \indent An alternative natural approach to bypass the girth conjecture is to allow ourself to take care only of a subset of pairs S×VS \times V for a given subset of vertices S⊆VS \subseteq V referred to here as \emph{sources}. Spanners in which the distances in S×VS \times V are bounded are referred to as \emph{sourcewise spanners}. Several constructions for this variant are provided (e.g., multiplicative sourcewise spanners, additive sourcewise spanners and more).

Explore this paper’s authors, topics and related work.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Reviews 0

Write a reviewWrite

No reviews yet.

Discussion 0

Add a commentWrite

No comments yet.