Paper detail

Burnability of Double Spiders and Path Forests

The burning number of a graph can be used to measure the spreading speed of contagion in a network. The burning number conjecture is arguably the main unresolved conjecture related to this graph parameter, which can be settled by showing that every tree of order $m^2$ has burning number at most $m$. This is known to hold for many classes of trees, including spiders - trees with exactly one vertex of degree greater than two. In fact, it has been verified that certain spiders of order slightly larger than $m^2$ also have burning numbers at most $m$, a result that has then been conjectured to be true for all trees. The first focus of this paper is to verify this slightly stronger conjecture for double spiders - trees with two vertices of degrees at least three and they are adjacent. Our other focus concerns the burning numbers of path forests, a class of graphs in which their burning numbers are naturally related to that of spiders and double spiders. Here, our main result shows that a path forest of order $m^2$ with a sufficiently long shortest path has burning number exactly $m$, the smallest possible for any path forest of the same order.

preprint2022arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.