Paper detail

Burer-Monteiro factorizability of nuclear norm regularized optimization

This paper studies the relationship between the nuclear norm-regularized minimization problem, which minimizes the sum of a $C^2$ function $h$ and a positive multiple of the nuclear norm, denoted by $f$, and its factorized problem obtained by the Burer-Monteiro technique. We are interested in deriving conditions that ensure every second-order stationary point of the factorized problem corresponds to a global minimizer of $f$, a property we call the $r$-factorizability of $f$ in this paper. Under suitable restricted isometry property (RIP) type assumptions on $h$, we prove the $r$-factorizability of $f$. Moreover, the RIP constant in our paper is tight, in the sense that we can construct concrete examples of $f$ that fail to be $r$-factorizable when the RIP constant is below the threshold. Our technique for constructing such examples is novel and may be of independent interest: specifically, we use a variant of the Von Neumann's trace inequality and relate the existence of such examples to the optimal value of a quadratic program involving the RIP constant, then we explicitly solve this optimization problem to detect all the possible counterexamples.

preprint2026arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.