Paper detail

Buneman's theorem for trees with exatcly n vertices

Let ${\cal T}=(T,w)$ be a positive-weighted tree with at least $n$ vertices. For any $i,j \in \{1,...,n\}$, let $D_{i,j} ({\cal T})$ be the weight of the unique path in $T$ connecting $i$ and $j$. The $D_{i,j} ({\cal T})$ are called $2$-weights of ${\cal T}$ and, if we put in order the $2$-weights, the vector which has the $D_{i,j} ({\cal T})$ as components is called \emph{$2$-dissimilarity vector} of $ {\cal T}$. Given a family of positive real numbers $\{D_{i,j}\}_{i,j \in \{1,...,n\}}$, we say that a positive-weighted tree ${\cal T}=(T,w)$ realizes the family if $\{1,...,n\} \subset V(T)$ and $D_{i,j}({\cal T})=D_{i,j}$ for any $ i,j \in \{1,...,n\}$. A characterization of $2$-dissimilarity families of positive weighted trees is already known (see \cite{B}, \cite{SimP} or \cite{St}): the families must satisfy the well-known \emph{four-point condition}. However we can wonder when there exists a positive-weighted tree with \emph{exactly} $n$ vertices, $1,...,n,$ and realizing the family $\{D_{i,j}\}$. In this paper we will show that the four-point condition is necessary but no more sufficient, and so we will introduce two additional conditions (see Theorem \ref{thm:ThmAgne}).

preprint2014arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.