Paper detail

Bunch width versus macrostep height: A quantitative study of the effects of step-step repulsion

Bunching of steps at the surface of growing crystals can be induced by both directions of the driving force: step up and step down. The processes happen in different adatom concentrations and differ in character. In this study we show how the overall picture of the bunching process depends on the strength of short range step-step repulsion. The repulsive interaction between steps, controlled by an additional parameter, is introduced into the recently studied atomistic scale model of vicinal crystal growth, based on cellular automata. It is shown that the repulsion modifies bunching process in a different way, depending on the direction of the destabilizing force. In particular, bunch profiles, stability diagrams and time-scaling dependences of various bunch properties are affected when the step-step repulsion increases. The repulsion between steps creates a competition between two characteristic sizes - bunch width and macrostep height, playing the role of the second length scale that describes the step bunching phenomenon. A new characteristic time scale dependent on the step-step repulsion parameter emerges as an effect of interplay between (01) faceted macrosteps and (11) faceted bunches. The bunch height being the major characteristic size of the bunches is not influenced dramatically by the repulsion.

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.