Paper detail

Bulk pressure in fluid-dynamical simulations of Pb-Pb and p-Pb collisions at the LHC energies

State-of-the-art fluid dynamical simulations of relativistic heavy-ion collisions employ initial state models which result in a rather strong radial flow. In order to fit the experimental observables, a non-negligible bulk viscosity of the QGP and/or hadronic matter is required. We examine modern parametrizations of the bulk viscosity to entropy density ratio $ζ/s$ used in recent fluid dynamical simulations, and explore the relative magnitude of the associated bulk viscous corrections in space-time, for Pb-Pb and p-Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}}=2.76$ TeV LHC energy with a state-of-the-art initial state provided by TRENTo model. It turns out that, at a typical particlization hypersurface, the effect of bulk viscosity out-competes the one of shear viscosity, and in a significantly large part of the space-time volume, the bulk pressure strongly counteracts the equilibrium pressure, thus the effective pressure approaches zero. The latter potentially challenges the applicability of fluid-dynamical modelling of heavy ion-ion and proton-ion collisions at the LHC energies.

preprint2022arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors3 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.