Paper detail

Building large k-cores from sparse graphs

A popular model to measure network stability is the $k$-core, that is the maximal induced subgraph in which every vertex has degree at least $k$. For example, $k$-cores are commonly used to model the unraveling phenomena in social networks. In this model, users having less than $k$ connections within the network leave it, so the remaining users form exactly the $k$-core. In this paper we study the question whether it is possible to make the network more robust by spending only a limited amount of resources on new connections. A mathematical model for the $k$-core construction problem is the following Edge $k$-Core optimization problem. We are given a graph $G$ and integers $k$, $b$ and $p$. The task is to ensure that the $k$-core of $G$ has at least $p$ vertices by adding at most $b$ edges. The previous studies on Edge $k$-Core demonstrate that the problem is computationally challenging. In particular, it is NP-hard when $k=3$, W[1]-hard being parameterized by $k+b+p$ (Chitnis and Talmon, 2018), and APX-hard (Zhou et al, 2019). Nevertheless, we show that there are efficient algorithms with provable guarantee when the $k$-core has to be constructed from a sparse graph with some additional structural properties. Our results are 1) When the input graph is a forest, Edge $k$-Core is solvable in polynomial time; 2) Edge $k$-Core is fixed-parameter tractable (FPT) being parameterized by the minimum size of a vertex cover in the input graph. On the other hand, with such parameterization, the problem does not admit a polynomial kernel subject to a widely-believed assumption from complexity theory; 3) Edge $k$-Core is FPT parameterized by $\mathrm{tw}+k$. This improves upon a result of Chitnis and Talmon by not requiring $b$ to be small. Each of our algorithms is built upon a new graph-theoretical result interesting in its own.

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.