Paper detail

Buffer Occupancy and Delivery Reliability Tradeoffs for Epidemic Routing

To achieve end-to-end delivery in intermittently connected networks, epidemic routing is proposed for data delivery at the price of excessive buffer occupancy due to its store-and-forward nature. The ultimate goal of epidemic routing protocol design is to reduce system resource usage (e.g., buffer occupancy) while simultaneously providing data delivery with statistical guarantee. Therefore the tradeoffs between buffer occupancy and data delivery reliability are of utmost importance. In this paper we investigate the tradeoffs for two representative schemes: the global timeout scheme and the antipacket dissemination scheme that are proposed for lossy and lossless data delivery, respectively. For lossy data delivery, we show that with the suggested global timeout value, the per-node buffer occupancy only depends on the maximum tolerable packet loss rate and pairwise meeting rate. For lossless data delivery, we show that the buffer occupancy can be significantly reduced via fully antipacket dissemination. The developed tools therefore offer new insights for epidemic routing protocol designs and performance evaluations.

preprint2016arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.