Paper detail

Budget-Constrained Contract Design for Effort-Averse Sensors in Averaging Based Estimation

Consider a group of effort-averse, or lazy, sensors that seek to minimize the effort invested to collect measurements of a variable. Increasing the effort invested by the sensors improves the quality of the measurements provided to the central planner but this incurs increased costs to the sensors. The central planner, which processes the sensor measurements, employs an averaging estimator. It also determines contracts for rewarding sensors based on the measurements obtained. The problem of designing a contract that yields an estimation-error based quality-of-service level in return for the reward extended to sensors is investigated in this paper. To this end, a game is formulated between the central planner and the sensors. Conditions for the existence and uniqueness of an equilibrium are identified. The equilibrium is constructed explicitly and its properties in response to a reward based contract are studied. It turns out that the central planner, while not being able to directly measure the effort invested by the sensors, can enhance the estimation quality by rewarding each sensor based on the distance of its measurements from the output of the averaging estimator. Ultimately, optimal contracts are designed from the perspective of the budget required for achieving a specified level of estimation error.

preprint2016arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors3 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.