Paper detail

Browkin's discriminator conjecture

Let $q\ge 5$ be a prime and put $q^*=(-1)^{(q-1)/2}\cdot q$. We consider the integer sequence $u_q(1),u_q(2),\ldots,$ with $u_q(j)=(3^j-q^*(-1)^j)/4$. No term in this sequence is repeated and thus for each $n$ there is a smallest integer $m$ such that $u_q(1),\ldots,u_q(n)$ are pairwise incongruent modulo $m$. We write $D_q(n)=m$. The idea of considering the discriminator $D_q(n)$ is due to Browkin (2015) who, in case $3$ is a primitive root modulo $q,$ conjectured that the only values assumed by $D_q(n)$ are powers of $2$ and of $q$. We show that this is true for $n\neq 5$, but false for infinitely many $q$ in case $n=5$. We also determine $D_q(n)$ in case 3 is not a primitive root modulo $q$. Browkin's inspiration for his conjecture came from earlier work of Moree and Zumalacárregui (2016), who determined $D_5(n)$ for $n\ge 1$, thus establishing a conjecture of Salajan. For a fixed prime $q$ their approach is easily generalized, but requires some innovations in order to deal with all primes $q\ge 7$ and all $n\ge 1$. Interestingly enough, Fermat and Mirimanoff primes play a special role in this.

preprint2017arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.