Paper detail

Broadcast Channel Games: Equilibrium Characterization and a MIMO MAC-BC Game Duality

The emergence of heterogeneous decentralized networks without a central controller, such as device-to-device communication systems, has created the need for new problem frameworks to design and analyze the performance of such networks. As a key step towards such an analysis for general networks, this paper examines the strategic behavior of \emph{receivers} in a Gaussian broadcast channel (BC) and \emph{transmitters} in a multiple access channel (MAC) with sum power constraints (sum power MAC) using the framework of non-cooperative game theory. These signaling scenarios are modeled as generalized Nash equilibrium problems (GNEPs) with jointly convex and coupled constraints and the existence and uniqueness of equilibrium achieving strategies and equilibrium utilities are characterized for both the Gaussian BC and the sum power MAC. The relationship between Pareto-optimal boundary points of the capacity region and the generalized Nash equilibria (GNEs) are derived for the several special cases and in all these cases it is shown that all the GNEs are Pareto-optimal, demonstrating that there is no loss in efficiency when players adopt strategic behavior in these scenarios. Several key equivalence relations are derived and used to demonstrate a game-theoretic duality between the Gaussian MAC and the Gaussian BC. This duality allows a parametrized computation of the equilibria of the BC in terms of the equilibria of the MAC and paves the way to translate several MAC results to the dual BC scenario.

preprint2013arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.