Paper detail

Broad Band X-ray Spectra of Atoll Source 4U 1636-536: NuSTAR and Swift Results

In this work we investigate broad band (1-79 keV) spectral nature of the atoll source 4U 1636-536 using the combined Nu-STAR and SWIFT-XRT data. The spectra are complex and have emission components from the disc, boundary-layer and corona. In addition to that a broad iron line is also observed. A relativistic line model assuming Schwarzchild metric fits this feature. The total flux varies from 1.4 $\times$ 10$^{-9}$ to 4.36 $\times$ 10$^{-9}$ $ergs/s/cm^2$. At the highest flux level the source was found in the soft state. In this state the Comptonized component has temperature $kT_e \sim 3$ keV and optical depth $τ\sim $ 16. We also detect a non-thermal tail with index $\sim$ 2.4, contributing $\sim$ 10 \% of the total flux in the soft state. We also find that the inner disc radius, electron temperature and optical depth vary with the total 0.1-100 keV unabsorbed flux. We discuss the implication of the results in this paper.

preprint2016arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.