Paper detail

Broad-band analysis of X-ray pulsar 2S 1845$-$024

We present results of detailed investigation of the poorly studied X-ray pulsar 2S 1845$-$024 based on the data obtained with $NuSTAR$ observatory during the type I outburst in 2017. Neither pulse phase-averaged, nor phase-resolved spectra of the source show evidence for a cyclotron absorption feature. We also used the data obtained from other X-ray observatories ($Swift$, $XMM-Newton$ and $Chandra$) to study the spectral properties as a function of orbital phase. The analysis revealed a high hydrogen column density for the source reaching $\sim$10$^{24}$ cm$^{-2}$ around the periastron. Using high-quality $Chandra$ data we were able to obtain an accurate localization of 2S 1845$-$024 at R.A. = 18$^{h}$48$^{m}$16$^{s}$.8 and Dec. = $-$2$^{\circ}$25'25".1 (J2000) that allowed us to use infrared (IR) data to roughly classify the optical counterpart of the source as an OB supergiant at the distance of $\gtrsim$15 kpc.

preprint2021arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access7 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.