Paper detail

Broad and shifted iron-group emission lines in gamma-ray bursts as tests of the hypernova scenario

In the hypernova/collapsar model of gamma-ray bursts, it is natural that radiation is emitted by the inner engine for some time after the burst. This has been discussed as a possible source of the X-ray line emission observed in some afterglows. We show here that the natural geometry of a hypernova --a source of radiation at the bottom of a deep funnel-- has very significant consequences for the shape and central energy of the observed emission lines: the lines acquire a very broad scattering wing on the low-energy side and a characteristic second peak one Compton wavelength away from the initial energy, due to the once- and twice-scattered photons. We suggest that this explains the large width of the observed lines. Furthermore, the downscattering lowers the central line energy (by up to 1 keV in the source rest frame, before the lines become unrecognizable), so that the observed line energies can become consistent with originating from cobalt and nickel, as expected in few-day-old supernova ejecta.

preprint2001arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access4 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.