Paper detail

Brittle to ductile transitions in glasses: Roles of soft defects and loading geometry

Understanding the fracture toughness of glasses is of prime importance for science and technology. We study it here using extensive atomistic simulations in which the interaction potential, glass transition cooling rate and loading geometry are systematically varied, mimicking a broad range of experimentally accessible properties. Glasses' nonequilibrium mechanical disorder is quantified through $A_{\rm g}$, the dimensionless prefactor of the universal spectrum of nonphononic excitations, which measures the abundance of soft glassy defects that affect plastic deformability. We show that while a brittle-to-ductile transition might be induced by reducing the cooling rate, leading to a reduction in $A_{\rm g}$, iso-$\!A_{\rm g}$ glasses are either brittle or ductile depending on the degree of Poisson contraction under unconstrained uniaxial tension. Eliminating Poisson contraction using constrained tension reveals that iso-$\!A_{\rm g}$ glasses feature similar toughness, and that varying $A_{\rm g}$ under these conditions results in significant toughness variation. Our results highlight the roles played by both soft defects and loading geometry (which affects the activation of defects) in the toughness of glasses.

preprint2021arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors3 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.