Paper detail

Brightest stars of irregular and low-massive spiral galaxies

A search for a correlation between the luminosities of the brightest stars and luminosities of their host galaxies was carried out on archived Hubble Space Telescope (HST) F606W or F555W (V) and F814W (I) images of about 150 nearby galaxies. The sample contains only galaxies with on-going star formation (SF) and with known distances we derived with the TRGB-method. We correlated the average absolute luminosities of the three brightest blue and the three brightest red stars with the luminosity of a host. We found a linear relation for both the blue and the red stars in irregular and low-mass spiral galaxies. Their scatters are sufficiently small (0.m4) to make this relations useful for distance determination for low-mass galaxies. We found that all 31 dwarf galaxies (M_B>-13m) in our sample lack bright stars (M_V(BS)< -7.m0), probably due to the physical conditions that prevent their birth. For galaxies with higher luminosity in the range -18m<M_B<-13m, there is an asymmetry in the distribution of the number of galaxies relative to the linear dependence, indicating an increase in the fraction of galaxies with bright stars.

preprint2021arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access7 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.