Paper detail

Bright Source Subtraction Requirements For Redshifted 21 cm Measurements

The \hi 21 cm transition line is expected to be an important probe into the cosmic dark ages and epoch of reionization. Foreground source removal is one of the principal challenges for the detection of this signal. This paper investigates the extragalactic point source contamination and how accurately bright sources ($\gtrsim 1$ ~Jy) must be removed in order to detect 21 cm emission with upcoming radio telescopes such as the Murchison Widefield Array (MWA). We consider the residual contamination in 21 cm maps and power spectra due to position errors in the sky-model for bright sources, as well as frequency independent calibration errors. We find that a source position accuracy of 0.1 arcsec will suffice for detection of the \hi power spectrum. For calibration errors, 0.05 % accuracy in antenna gain amplitude is required in order to detect the cosmic signal. Both sources of subtraction error produce residuals that are localized to small angular scales, $\kperp \gtrsim 0.05 $Mpc$^{-1}$, in the two-dimensional power spectrum.

preprint2010arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.