Paper detail

Bright Lyman $\rm α$ emitters among Spitzer SMUVS galaxies in the MUSE/COSMOS field

We search for bright Ly$\rm α$ emitters among Spitzer SMUVS galaxies at z > 2.9 with homogeneous MUSE data. Although it only covers a small region of COSMOS, MUSE has the unique advantage of providing spectral information over the entire field, without the need of target pre-selection. This gives an unbiased detection of all the brightest Ly$\rm α$ emitters among SMUVS sources, which by design are stellar-mass selected galaxies. Within the studied area, ~14% of the SMUVS galaxies at z > 2.9 have Ly$\rm α$ fluxes F$\rm _λ$ > 7 x 10$^{-18}$ erg s$^{-1}$ cm$^{-2}$. These Ly$\rm α$ emitters are characterized by three types of emission, 47% show a single line profile, 19% present a double peak or a blue bump and 31% show a red tail. One object (3%) shows both a blue bump and a red tail. We also investigate the spectral energy distribution (SED) properties of the SMUVS MUSE-detected galaxies and MUSE non-detections. After stellar-mass matching both populations, we find that MUSE detected galaxies have generally lower extinction than SMUVS-only objects, while there is no clear intrinsic difference in the mass and age distributions. For the MUSE-detected SMUVS galaxies, we compare the instantaneous SFR lower limit given by Ly$\rm α$ flux with its past average derived from SED fitting, and find evidence for rejuvenation in some of our oldest objects. We also study the spectra of those Ly$\rm α$ emitters which are not detected in SMUVS in the same field. We find different distributions of the emission line profiles, which could be ascribed to the fainter Ly$\rm α$ luminosities of the MUSE-only sources and an intrinsically different mass distribution. Finally, we search for the presence of galaxy associations. MUSE's integral coverage is 20 times more likely to find associations than all other existing spectral data in COSMOS, biased by target pre-selection.

preprint2019arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access4 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.