Paper detail

Bridging Optical and Far-Infrared Emission-Line Diagrams of Galaxies from Local to the Epoch of Reionization: Characteristic High [O III] 88 $\mathrm{μm}$/SFR at $z > 6$

We present photoionization modeling of galaxy populations at $z\sim0$, $2$, and $> 6$ to bridge optical and far-infrared (FIR) emission-line diagrams. We collect galaxies with measurements of optical and/or FIR ([O III] 88 $\mathrm{μm}$ and [C II] 158 $\mathrm{μm}$) emission line fluxes and plot them on the [O III]$\lambda5007/\mathrm{Hβ}$--[N II]$\lambda6585/\mathrm{Hα}$ (BPT) and L([O III]88)/SFR--L([C II]158)/SFR diagrams, where SFR is the star-formation rate and L([O III]88) and L([C II]158) are the FIR line luminosities. We aim to explain the galaxy distributions on the two diagrams with photoionization models that employ three nebular parameters: the ionization parameter $U$, hydrogen density $n_\text{H}$, and gaseous metallicity $Z_\text{gas}$. Our models successfully reproduce the nebular parameters of local galaxies, and then predict the distributions of the $z\sim0$, $2$, and $> 6$ galaxies on the diagrams. The predicted distributions illustrate the redshift evolution on all the diagrams; e.g., [O III]$/\mathrm{Hβ}$ and [O III]88/[C II]158 ratios continuously decrease from $z > 6$ to $0$. Specifically, the $z > 6$ galaxies exhibit $\sim\!0.5$ dex higher $U$ than low-redshift galaxies at a given $Z_\text{gas}$ and show predicted flat distributions on the BPT diagram at $\log{\mathrm{[O III]/Hβ}} = 0.5$-$0.8$. We find that some of the $z > 6$ galaxies exhibit high L([O III]88)/SFR ratios. To explain these high ratios, our photoionization models require a low stellar-to-gaseous metallicity ratio or bursty/increasing star-formation history at $z > 6$. The James Webb Space Telescope will test the predictions and scenarios for the $z > 6$ galaxies proposed by our photoionization modeling.

preprint2022arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access6 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.