Paper detail

Bridge position and the representativity of spatial graphs

First, we extend Otal's result for the trivial knot to trivial spatial graphs, namely, we show that for any bridge tangle decomposing sphere $S^2$ for a trivial spatial graph $Γ$, there exists a 2-sphere $F$ such that $F$ contains $Γ$ and $F$ intersects $S^2$ in a single loop. Next, we introduce two invariants for spatial graphs. As a generalization of the bridge number for knots, we define the {\em bridge string number} $bs(Γ)$ of a spatial graph $Γ$ as the minimal number of $|Γ\cap S^2|$ for all bridge tangle decomposing sphere $S^2$. As a spatial version of the representativity for a graph embedded in a surface, we define the {\em representativity} of a non-trivial spatial graph $Γ$ as \[ r(Γ)=\max_{F\in\mathcal{F}} \min_{D\in\mathcal{D}_F} |\partial D\cap Γ|, \] where $\mathcal{F}$ is the set of all closed surfaces containing $Γ$ and $\mathcal{D}_F$ is the set of all compressing disks for $F$ in $S^3$. Then we show that for a non-trivial spatial graph $Γ$, \[ \displaystyle r(Γ)\le \frac{bs(Γ)}{2}. \] In particular, if $Γ$ is a knot, then $r(Γ)\le b(Γ)$, where $b(Γ)$ denotes the bridge number. This generalizes Schubert's result on torus knots.

preprint2010arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.