Paper detail

Breaking the thermally induced write error in heat assisted recording by using low and high Tc materials

Heat assisted recording is believed as a key technology in order to further increase the areal density of magnetic recording. In the work of Richter et al. [Richter et al. J. Appl. Phys. 111, 033909 (2012)] it is stated that storage densities will be limited to 15 to 20 Tbit/in2 due to thermally induced write errors. In this letter we propose a composite structure consisting of two materials with different Curie temperatures. A hard magnetic layer is on top of a high Tc soft magnetic layer. In this composite material the thermal write error is negligible up to areal densities of 50 to 100 Tbit/in2. It is shown that the effective thermal field gradient, which is reduced in this composite structure, is not relevant for a possible increase of the transition jitter. The transition jitter is dominated by a small distribution of the Curie temperature. The smallest jitter is obtained for the composite structure.

preprint2013arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.