Paper detail

Breaking the degeneracy between anisotropy and mass: The dark halo of the E0 galaxy NGC 6703

(abridged) We have measured line-of-sight velocity profiles (VPs) in the E0 galaxy NGC 6703 out to 2.6 R_e. From these data we constrain the mass distribution and the anisotropy of the stellar orbits in this galaxy. We have developed a non-parametric technique to determine the DF f(E,L^2) directly from the kinematic data. From Monte Carlo tests using the spatial extent, sampling, and error bars of the NGC 6703 data we find that smooth underlying DFs can be recovered to an rms accuracy of 12%, and the anisotropy parameter beta(r) to an accuracy of 0.1, in a given potential. An asymptotically constant halo circular velocity v_0 can be determined with an accuracy of +- \lta 50km/s. For NGC 6703 we determine the true circular velocity at 2.6 R_e to be 250 +- 40km/s at 95% c.l., corresponding to a total mass in NGC 6703 inside 78'' (13.5 h_50^-1 kpc), of 1.6-2.6 x 10^11 h_50^-1 Msun. No model without dark matter will fit the data; however, a maximum stellar mass model in which the luminous component provides nearly all the mass in the centre does. In such a model, the total luminous mass inside 78'' is 9 x 10^10 Msun and the integrated M/L_B=5.3-10, corresponding to a rise from the center by at least a factor of 1.6. The anisotropy of the stellar distribution function in NGC 6703 changes from near-isotropic at the centre to slightly radially anisotropic (beta=0.3-0.4 at 30'', beta=0.2-0.4 at 60'') and is not well-constrained at the outer edge of the data. Our results suggest that also elliptical galaxies begin to be dominated by dark matter at radii of \sim 10kpc.

preprint1997arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access4 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.