Paper detail

Breaking of self-averaging properties and selection effects in the Luminous Red Galaxies sample

We study the statistical properties of the Luminous Red Galaxies sample from the Sloan Digital Sky Survey. In particular we test, by determining the probability density function (PDF) of galaxy (conditional) counts in spheres, whether statistical properties are self-averaging within the sample. We find that there are systematic differences in the shape of the PDF and in the location of its peak, signaling that there are major systematic effects in the data which make the estimation of volume average quantities unreliable within this sample. We discuss that these systematic effects are related to the fluctuating behavior of the redshift counts which can be originated by intrinsic fluctuations in the galaxy density field or by observational selection effects. The latter possibility implies that more than 20 % of the galaxies have not been observed and that such a selection should not be a smooth function of redshift.

preprint2010arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.