Paper detail

Breaking barriers for women in science

This report summarises the work and results produced at the 146th European Study Group with Industry/co-creation event with society on the challenge \textit{Breaking barriers for women in Science}. The aim of this challenge, proposed by the Cyprus-based non-profit AIPFE Cyprus-Women of Europe, was to quantify the barriers that women face in science so that eventually policy changes can take place in Cyprus and elsewhere. Two distinct but related challenges were considered. The first challenge was to quantify the wage gap between men and women in 28 European countries. In this connection, we analysed Eurostat data and developed a mathematical model quantifying how probable it is for countries to decrease their wage gap. Secondly, we analysed data provided by the University of Cyprus and determined the percentage of women and men in STEM (Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics) departments as they move up the academic ladder, starting from the undergraduate level. Studying the latter challenge is a first step in studying the wage gap in all Cypriot universities and in other universities abroad. This work was supported financially by the EU project SciShops.eu, the EU Mathematics for Industry Network (MI-NET) and several other organisations.

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.