Paper detail

Breakdown of large-N reduction in the quenched Eguchi-Kawai model

We study the validity of the large-N equivalence between four-dimensional SU(N) lattice gauge theory and its momentum quenched version -- the Quenched Eguchi-Kawai (QEK) model. We have found strong evidence that this equivalence does not hold in the weak-coupling regime (and thus in the continuum limit). This is based on weak-coupling analytic arguments and Monto-Carlo simulations at intermediate couplings with 20 <= N <= 200. Since detailed expositions of our arguments, methods and results have already appeared in Phys. Rev. D78:034507 (2008) and Phys. Rev. D78:074503 (2008), we attempt here to give a more intuitive explanation of our results. The breakdown of reduction that we find is due to a dynamically generated correlation between different Euclidean components of the gauge fields.

preprint2008arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors3 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.