Paper detail

Branestrahlung: radiation in the particle-brane collision

We calculate the radiation accompanying gravitational collision of the domain wall and the point particle in five-dimensional spacetime. This process, which can be regarded as brane-particle bremsstrahlung, here called {\it branestrahlung}, has unusual features. Since the brane has intrinsic dynamics, it gets excited in the course of collision, and, in particular, at the moment of perforation the shock branon wave is generated, which then expands with the velocity of light. Therefore, apart from the time-like source, whose radiation can be computed in a standard way, the total radiation source contains a light-like part whose retarded field is quite non-trivial, exhibiting interesting retardation and memory effects. We analyze this field in detail, showing that, contrary to the claims that the light-like sources should not radiate at all, the radiation is non-zero and has classically divergent spectrum. We estimate the total radiation power introducing appropriate cutoffs. In passing, we explain how the sum of the non-local (with the support inside the light cone) and the local (supported on the cone) singular parts of the Green's function of the five-dimensional d'Alembert equation together define a regular functional.

preprint2016arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.