Paper detail

Brane Tilings, M2-branes and Orbifolds

Brane Tilings represent one of the largest classes of superconformal theories with known gravity duals in 3+1 and also 2+1 dimensions. They provide a useful link between a large class of quiver gauge theories and their moduli spaces, which are the toric Calabi-Yau (CY) singularities. This thesis includes a discussion of an algorithm that can be used to generate all brane tilings with any given number of superpotential terms. All tilings with at most 8 superpotential terms have been generated using an implementation of this method. Orbifolds are a subject of central importance in string theory. It is widely known that there may be two or more orbifolds of a space by a finite group. Abelian Calabi-Yau orbifolds of the form $\BC^3 / Γ$ can be counted according to the size of the group $|Γ|$. Three methods of counting these orbifolds will be given. A brane tiling together with a set of Chern Simons levels is sufficient to define a quiver Chern-Simons theory which describes the worldvolume theory of the M2-brane probe. A forward algorithm exists which allows us to easily compute the toric data associated to the moduli space of the quiver Chern-Simons theory from knowledge of the tiling and Chern-Simons levels. This forward algorithm will be discussed and illustrated with a few examples. It is possible that two different Chern-Simons theories have the same moduli-space. This effect, sometimes known as `toric duality' will be described further. We will explore how two Chern--Simons theories (corresponding to brane tilings) can be related to each other by the Higgs mechanism and how brane tilings (with CS levels) that correspond to 14 fano 3-folds have been constructed. The idea of `child' and `parent' brane tilings will be introduced and we will discuss how it has been possible to count `children' using the symmetry of the `parent' tiling.

preprint2011arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Authors

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.