Paper detail

Branching Ratios for $B \to K^* γ$ and $B \to ργ$ Decays in Next-to-Leading Order in the Large Eneregy Effective Theory

We calculate the so-called hard spectator corrections in ${\cal O} (α_s)$ in the leading-twist approximation to the decay widths for $B \to K^{*} γ$ and $B \to ργ$ decays and their charge conjugates, using the Large Energy Effective Theory (LEET) techniques. Combined with the hard vertex and annihilation contributions, they are used to compute the branching ratios for these decays in the next-to-leading order (NLO) in the strong coupling $α_s$ and in leading power in $Λ_{\rm QCD}/M_B$. These corrections are found to be large, leading to the inference that the theoretical branching ratios for the decays $B \to K^* γ$ in the LEET approach can be reconciled with current data only for significantly lower values of the form factors than their estimates in the QCD sum rule and Lattice QCD approaches. However, the form factor related uncertainties mostly cancel in the ratios ${\cal B}(B \to ργ)/{\cal B}(B \to K^* γ)$ and $Δ= (Δ^{+0}+ Δ^{-0})/2$, where $Δ^{\pm 0} = Γ(B^\pm \to ρ^\pm γ)/ [2 Γ(B^0 (\bar B^0)\to ρ^0 γ)] - 1$, and hence their measurements will provide quantitative information on the standard model parameters, in particular the ratio of the CKM matrix elements $| V_{td}/V_{ts}|$ and the inner angle $α$ of the CKM-unitarity triangle. We also calculate direct CP asymmetries for the decays $B^\pm \to ρ^\pm γ$ and $B^0/\bar B^0 \to ρ^0 γ$ and find, in conformity with the observations made in the existing literature, that the hard spectator contributions significantly reduce the asymmetries arising from the vertex corrections.

preprint2005arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.