Paper detail

Branching ratio measurement of $K_S\to γγ$ decay using a pure $\ks$ beam in the KLOE detector

We have analyzed 1.62 fb$^{-1}$ of $e^{+}e^{-}$ collisions at a center of mass energy $\sim M_ϕ$ collected by the KLOE experiment at DA$Φ$NE. This sample corresponds to a production of $\sim$ 1.7 billion of $\ks$ $\kl$ pairs which allowed us to search for the rare $K_S\to γγ$ decay. $K_S$ are tagged by the $K_L$ interaction in the calorimeter and the signal is searched for by requiring two additional prompt photons. Strong kinematic requirements reduce the initial 0.5$\times 10^6$ events to 2300 candidates from which we extract a signal of 600 $\pm$ 35 events. By normalizing to the $\ks \to 2 π^0$ decays counted in the same sample, the measured value of BR($\ks \to γγ$) is (2.27 $\pm 0.13(stat.) ^{+0.03}_{-0.04} (syst.)) \times 10^{-6}$, in agreement with $O(P^4)$ Chiral Perturbation Theory predictions.

preprint2007arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.