Paper detail

Branching-ratio and CP violation in semi-inclusive flavor-changing top decays

Semi-inclusive top decays, $t \to q_i \v$, are examined in the framework of the standard model, with $q_i = u {\rm or} c$, $\v$ : vector meson formed by $q_j \qb_j$ ($q_j = d, s, b$). By using a simple model of hadronization, that is $ 0 ł| \qb_j γ^μq_j \r| \v = \mv \fv \evj^μ$, the total branching ratio is expected to be $\br(\tivj) < ({ł| \vij^\ast \vtj \r|}/{ł| \vtb \r|})^2 \times O({10}^{-3})$ depends on the size of the coupling constant $\fv$. On the other hand, the CP asymmetry should be induced only by the long-distance effects of intermediate state $q_k \qb_k$ ($q_k = d, s, b$) that subsequent scatters into the vector meson. The analytical results including the continuum contributions are given with keeping all masses. However, it yields the CP asymmetry to be small, i.e. $\acp (\tivj) < {\im [(\vij^\ast \vtj)^\ast (\vik^\ast \vtk)]}/{ł| \vij^\ast \vtj \r|^2} \times O({10}^{-2})$ for an identified $q_k \qb_k$ intermediate state, and suppressed more again by a factor of $\sim {({m_b}^2 - {m_s}^2)}/{\mv^2}$ for summing up all of them. Particularly, $\acp (t \to u Υ) \simeq \pm 1%$, induced by the intermediate state $d\bar{d}$ or $s\bar{s}$.

preprint1998arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.