Paper detail

Branching Ratio and CP Asymmetry of B_s \to K^*_0(1430)πDecays in the PQCD Approach

In the two-quark model supposition for $K_0^{*}(1430)$, the branching ratios and the direct CP-violating asymmetries for decays $\bar B_s^0\to K^{*0}_0(1430)π^0, K^{*+}_0(1430)π^-$ are studied by employing the perturbative QCD factorization approach. We find that although these two decays are both tree-dominated, the ratio of their penguin to tree contributions are very different: there is only a few percent for the decay $\bar B_s^0\to K^{*+}_0(1430)π^-$, while about 37% in scenario I, even 51% in scenario II for the decay $\bar B_s^0\to K^{*0}_0(1430)π^0$. It results that these two decays have very different values in the branching ratios and the direct CP asymmetries. The branching ratio of the decay $\bar B_s^0\to K^{*+}_0(1430)π^-$ is at the order of $10^{-5}$, and its direct CP asymmetry is about (20-30)%. While for the decay $\bar B_s^0\to K^{*0}_0(1430)π^0$, its direct CP-violating asymmetry is very large and about 90%, but it is difficult to measure it, because the branching ratio for this channel is small and only $10^{-7}$ order.

preprint2012arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.