Paper detail

Branching Ratio and CP Asymmetry of B_s \to K^*_0(1430)ρ(ω,ϕ) Decays in the PQCD Approach

In the two-quark model supposition for $K_0^{*}(1430)$, which can be viewed as either the first excited state (scenario I) or the lowest lying state (scenario II), the branching ratios and the direct CP-violating asymmetries for decays $\bar B_s^0\to K^{*0}_0(1430)ϕ, K^{*0}_0(1430)ω, K^{*0}_0(1430)ρ^0, K^{*+}_0(1430)ρ^-$ are studied by employing the perturbative QCD factorization approach. We find the following results: (a) Enhanced by the color allowed tree amplitude with large Wilson coefficients $a_1=C_2+C_1/3$, the branching ratio of $\bar B_s^0\to K^{*+}_0(1430)ρ^-$ is much larger than those of the other three decays and arrives at $(3.4^{+0.8}_{-0.7})\times 10^{-5}$ in scenario I, even $10^{-4}$ order in scenario II, and its direct CP violating asymmetry is the smallest, around 10%, so this channel might be measurable in the current LHC-b experiments, where a large number (about $10^{12}$) of $B$ mesons will be produced per year. This high statistics will make the measurement possible. (b) For the decay modes $\bar B^0_s\to K^{*0}_0(1430)ω, K^{*0}_0(1430)ρ^0$, their direct CP-violating asymmetries are large, but it might be difficult to measure them, because their branching ratios are small and less than (or near) $10^{-6}$ in both scenarios. For example, in scenario I, these values are ${\cal B}(\bar B_s^0\to K^*_0(1430)ω)=(8.2^{+1.8}_{-1.7})\times 10^{-7}, {\cal B}(\bar B_s^0\to K^*_0(1430)ρ^0)=(9.9^{+2.1}_{-2.0})\times 10^{-7}, \acp^{dir}(\bar B^0_s\to K^{*0}_0(1430)ω)=-24.1^{+2.8}_{-2.5}, \acp^{dir}(\bar B^0_s\to K^{*0}_0(1430)ρ^0)=26.6^{+2.5}_{-2.5}.$ (c) For the decay $\bar B^0_s\to K^*_0(1430)ϕ$, the predicted branching ratios are also small and a few times $10^{-7}$ in both scenarios; there is no tree contribution at the leading order, so its direct CP-violating asymmetry is naturally zero.

preprint2011arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.