Paper detail

Bounds on Walsh coefficients by dyadic difference and a new Koksma-Hlawka type inequality for Quasi-Monte Carlo integration

In this paper we give a new Koksma-Hlawka type inequality for Quasi-Monte Carlo (QMC) integration. QMC integration of a function $f\colon[0,1)^s\rightarrow \mathbb{R}$ by a finite point set $\mathcal{P}\subset [0,1)^s$ is the approximation of the integral $I(f):=\int_{[0,1)^s}f(\mathbf{x})\,d\mathbf{x}$ by the average $I_{\mathcal{P}}(f):=\frac{1}{|\mathcal{P}|}\sum_{\mathbf{x} \in \mathcal{P}}f(\mathbf{x})$. We treat a certain class of point sets $\mathcal{P}$ called digital nets. A Koksma-Hlawka type inequality is an inequality bounding the integration error $\text{Err}(f;\mathcal{P}):=I(f)-I_{\mathcal{P}}(f)$ by a bound of the form $|\text{Err}(f;\mathcal{P})|\le C\cdot \|f\|\cdot D(\mathcal{P})$. We can obtain a Koksma-Hlawka type inequality by estimating bounds on $|\hat{f}(\mathbf{k})|$, where $\hat{f}(\mathbf{k})$ is a generalized Fourier coefficient with respect to the Walsh system. In this paper we prove bounds on Walsh coefficients $\hat{f}(\mathbf{k})$ by introducing an operator called `dyadic difference' $\partial_{i,n}$. By converting dyadic differences $\partial_{i,n}$ to derivatives $\frac{\partial }{\partial x_i}$, we get a new bound on $|\hat{f}(\mathbf{k})|$ for a function $f$ whose mixed partial derivatives up to order $α$ in each variable are continuous. This new bound is smaller than the known bound on $|\hat{f}(\mathbf{k})|$ under some condition. The new Koksma-Hlawka inequality is derived using this new bound on the Walsh coefficients.

preprint2015arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.