Paper detail

Bounds on the origin of extragalactic ultrahigh energy cosmic rays from the IceCube neutrino observations

We study general implications of the IceCube observations in the energy range from $10^{6}$ GeV to $10^{10}$ GeV for the origin of extragalactic ultrahigh energy cosmic rays assuming that high energy neutrinos are generated by the photomeson production of protons in the extragalactic universe. The PeV-energy neutrino flux observed by IceCube gives strong bounds on the photomeson-production optical depth of protons in their sources and the intensity of the proton component of extragalactic cosmic rays. The neutrino flux implies that extragalactic cosmic-ray sources should have the optical depth greater than $\sim 0.01$ and contribute to more than a few percent of the observed bulk of cosmic rays at 10 PeV. If the spectrum of cosmic rays from these extragalactic sources extends well beyond 1 EeV, the neutrino flux indicates that extragalactic cosmic rays are dominant in the observed total cosmic-ray flux at 1 EeV and above, favoring the dip transition model of cosmic rays. The cosmic-ray sources are also required to be efficient neutrino emitters with the optical depth close to unity in this case. The highest energy cosmic-ray ($\sim 10^{11}$ GeV) sources should not be strongly evolved with redshift to account for the IceCube observations, suggesting that any cosmic-ray radiation scenarios involving distant powerful astronomical objects with strong cosmological evolution are strongly disfavored. These considerations conclude that none of the known extragalactic astronomical objects can be simultaneously a source of both PeV and trans-EeV energy cosmic rays. We also discuss a possible effect of cosmic-ray propagation in magnetized intergalactic space to the connection between the observed total cosmic-ray flux and neutrino flux.

preprint2014arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.