Paper detail

Bounds on the Number of Huffman and Binary-Ternary Trees

Huffman coding is a widely used method for lossless data compression because it optimally stores data based on how often the characters occur in Huffman trees. An $n$-ary Huffman tree is a connected, cycle-lacking graph where each vertex can have either $n$ "children" vertices connecting to it, or 0 children. Vertices with 0 children are called \textit{leaves}. We let $h_n(q)$ represent the total number of $n$-ary Huffman trees with $q$ leaves. In this paper, we use a recursive method to generate upper and lower bounds on $h_n(q)$ and get $h_2(q) \approx (0.1418532)(1.7941471)^q+(0.0612410)(1.2795491)^q$ for $n=2$. This matches the best results achieved by Elsholtz, Heuberger, and Prodinger in August 2011. Our approach reveals patterns in Huffman trees that we used in our analysis of the Binary-Ternary (BT) trees we created. Our research opens a completely new door in data compression by extending the study of Huffman trees to BT trees. Our study of BT trees paves the way for designing data-specific trees, minimizing possible wasted storage space from Huffman coding. We prove a recursive formula for the number of BT trees with $q$ leaves. Furthermore, we provide analysis and further proofs to reach numeric bounds. Our discoveries have broad applications in computer data compression. These results also improve graphical representations of protein sequences that facilitate in-depth genome analysis used in researching evolutionary patterns.

preprint2013arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access4 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.