Paper detail

Bounds on Stability and Latency in Wireless Communication

In this paper, we study stability and latency of routing in wireless networks where it is assumed that no collision will occur. Our approach is inspired by the adversarial queuing theory, which is amended in order to model wireless communication. More precisely, there is an adversary that specifies transmission rates of wireless links and injects data in such a way that an average number of data injected in a single round and routed through a single wireless link is at most $r$, for a given $r\in (0,1)$. We also assume that the additional &#34;burst&#34; of data injected during any time interval and scheduled via a single link is bounded by a given parameter $b$. Under this scenario, we show that the nodes following so called {\em work-conserving} scheduling policies, not necessarily the same, are guaranteed stability (i.e., bounded queues) and reasonably small data latency (i.e., bounded time on data delivery), for injection rates $r<1/d$, where $d$ is the maximum length of a routing path. Furthermore, we also show that such a bound is asymptotically optimal on $d$.

preprint2010arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.