Paper detail

Bounds for codes on pentagon and other cycles

The capacity of a graph is defined as the rate of exponential grow of independent sets in the strong powers of the graph. In strong power, an edge connects two sequences if at each position letters are equal or adjacent. We consider a variation of the problem where edges in the power graphs are removed among sequences which differ in more than a fraction $δ$ of coordinates. For odd cycles, we derive an upper bound on the corresponding rate which combines Lovász' bound on the capacity with Delsarte's linear programming bounds on the minimum distance of codes in Hamming spaces. For the pentagon, this shows that for $δ\ge {1-{1\over\sqrt{5}}}$ the Lovász rate is the best possible, while we prove by a Gilbert-Varshamov-type bound that a higher rate is achievable for $δ< {2\over 5}$. Communication interpretation of this question is the problem of sending quinary symbols subject to $\pm 1\mod 5$ disturbance. The maximal communication rate subject to the zero undetected-error equals capacity of a pentagon. The question addressed here is how much this rate can be increased if only a fraction $δ$ of symbols is allowed to be disturbed

preprint2015arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors3 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.