Paper detail

Bounding the weight choosability number of a graph

Let $G = (V,E)$ be a graph, and for each $e \in E(G)$, let $L_e$ be a list of real numbers. Let $w:E(G) \to \cup_{e \in E(G)}L_e$ be an edge weighting function such that $w(e) \in L_e$ for each $e \in E(G)$, and let $c_w$ be the vertex colouring obtained by $c_w(v) = \sum_{e \ni v}w(e)$. We desire the smallest possible $k$ such that, for any choice of $\{L_e \,|\, e \in E(G)\}$ where $|L_e| \geq k$ for all $e \in E(G)$, there exists an edge weighting function $w$ for which $c_w$ is proper. The smallest such value of $k$ is the weight choosability number of $G$. This colouring problem, introduced by Bartnicki, Grytczuk and Niwczyk (2009), is the list variation of the now famous 1-2-3 Conjecture due to Karoński, Łuczak, and Thomason (2004). Bartnicki et al. develop a method for approaching the problem based on the Combinatorial Nullstellensatz. Though they show that some particular classes of graphs have weight choosability number at most $3$, it was known whether their method could be extended to prove a bound which holds for all admissible graphs. In this paper, we show that this is indeed possible, showing that every graph is $(Δ+ d + 1)$-weight choosable, where $Δ$ is the graph's maximum degree and $d$ is its degeneracy. In fact, more general results on total weight choosability are provided, where one assigns weights to edges and vertices. Improved bounds are also established for some classes of graph products.

preprint2014arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.