Bounding the weight choosability number of a graph

preprint2014arXivOpen access

Abstract

Let G=(V,E)G = (V,E) be a graph, and for each e∈E(G)e \in E(G), let LeL_e be a list of real numbers. Let w:E(G)→∪e∈E(G)Lew:E(G) \to \cup_{e \in E(G)}L_e be an edge weighting function such that w(e)∈Lew(e) \in L_e for each e∈E(G)e \in E(G), and let cwc_w be the vertex colouring obtained by cw(v)=∑e∋vw(e)c_w(v) = \sum_{e \ni v}w(e). We desire the smallest possible kk such that, for any choice of {Le ∣ e∈E(G)}\{L_e \,|\, e \in E(G)\} where ∣Le∣≥k|L_e| \geq k for all e∈E(G)e \in E(G), there exists an edge weighting function ww for which cwc_w is proper. The smallest such value of kk is the weight choosability number of GG. This colouring problem, introduced by Bartnicki, Grytczuk and Niwczyk (2009), is the list variation of the now famous 1-2-3 Conjecture due to Karoński, Łuczak, and Thomason (2004). Bartnicki et al. develop a method for approaching the problem based on the Combinatorial Nullstellensatz. Though they show that some particular classes of graphs have weight choosability number at most 33, it was known whether their method could be extended to prove a bound which holds for all admissible graphs. In this paper, we show that this is indeed possible, showing that every graph is (Δ+d+1)(Δ+ d + 1)-weight choosable, where ΔΔ is the graph's maximum degree and dd is its degeneracy. In fact, more general results on total weight choosability are provided, where one assigns weights to edges and vertices. Improved bounds are also established for some classes of graph products.

Explore this paper’s authors, topics and related work.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Reviews 0

Write a reviewWrite

No reviews yet.

Discussion 0

Add a commentWrite

No comments yet.