Paper detail

Bounding the Greedy Strategy in Finite-Horizon String Optimization

We consider an optimization problem where the decision variable is a string of bounded length. For some time there has been an interest in bounding the performance of the greedy strategy for this problem. Here, we provide weakened sufficient conditions for the greedy strategy to be bounded by a factor of $(1-(1-1/K)^K)$, where $K$ is the optimization horizon length. Specifically, we introduce the notions of $K$-submodularity and $K$-GO-concavity, which together are sufficient for this bound to hold. By introducing a notion of \emph{curvature} $η\in(0,1]$, we prove an even tighter bound with the factor $(1/η)(1-e^{-η})$. Finally, we illustrate the strength of our results by considering two example applications. We show that our results provide weaker conditions on parameter values in these applications than in previous results.

preprint2016arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.