Paper detail

Bounding signed bipartite partial t-trees and application to edge-coloring

Given a signed bipartite graph $(B, π)$ of negative girth $2k$, we present a necessary and sufficient condition for it to have the following property: each signed bipartite graph $(G, σ)$ whose negative girth is at least $2k$ and whose underlying graph has treewidth at most $t$ admits a homomorphism to $(B, π)$. Applying the result on the signed projective cube $SPC(2k-1)$, we conclude that every signed bipartite graph of negative girth at least $2k$ whose underlying graph is a partial 3-tree admits a homomorphism to $SPC(2k-1)$. For planar partial 3-trees, applying duality we conclude that if $G$ is a planar $2k$-regular multigraph whose dual has treewidth at most 3 and such that every edge-cut $(X, V\backslash X)$, where $|X|$ is odd, has size at least $2k$, then $G$ is $2k$-edge-colorable. This supports a conjecture of Seymour which, in full generality, largely extends Tait's reformulation of the four-color theorem, claiming that the fractional edge-chromatic number of a planar multigraph determines its edge-chromatic number. Finally, noting the contrast between fractional isomorphism and quantum isomorphism, where the former admits a polynomial time algorithm while the latter is proved to be undecidable, and observing the similarities of these notions to the subject of our study, we ask if there is an algorithm to decide if an input signed graph $\widehat{B}$ has the following property: if a signed planar graph $\widehat{G}$ does not map to $\widehat{B}$, it would be because a cycle in $\widehat{G}$ does not map to $\widehat{B}$. In other words, minimal planar graphs that do not map to $\widehat{B}$ are signed cycles.

preprint2026arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.