Paper detail

Boundary null-controllability of 1d linearized compressible Navier-Stokes system by one control force

In this article, we study the boundary null-controllability properties of the one-dimensional linearized (around $(Q_0,V_0)$ with constants $Q_0>0, V_0>0$) compressible Navier-Stokes equations in the interval $(0,1)$ when a control function is acting either on the density or velocity component at one end of the interval. We first prove that the linearized system, with a Dirichlet boundary control on the density component and homogeneous Dirichlet boundary conditions on the velocity component, is null-controllable in $H^s_{per}(0,1) \times L^2(0,1)$ for any $s > 1/2$ provided the time $T > 1$, where $H^s_{per}(0,1)$ denotes the Sobolev space of periodic functions. The proof is based on solving a mixed parabolic-hyperbolic moments problem and to do so, we perform a spectral analysis for the associated adjoint operator which is the main involved part of this work. As a corollary, we also prove that the system is approximately controllable in $L^2(0,1) \times L^2(0,1)$ when $T>1$. On the other hand, assuming that the density is equal on the two boundary points w.r.t. time, when a control is applied on the velocity part through a Dirichlet condition, we can only able to prove that the system is null-controllable in a strict subspace of finite codimension $\mathcal{H}\subset H^s_{per}(0,1) \times L^2(0,1)$ for $s>1/2$ when $T>1$. More precisely, in this case we are able to show that all the eigenfunctions of the associated adjoint operator are observable for higher frequencies whereas for the lower frequencies it is hard to conclude anything. A parabolic-hyperbolic joint Ingham-type inequality which we prove in this article, leads to an observability inequality in the space $\mathcal{H}^*$ and the controllability result follows. The significant point is that the moments method does not yield a better space for the null-controllability when a control acts on the velocity part.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.