Paper detail

Boundary conditions in PDE model of collisions of swimmers

The goal of the paper is to determine boundary conditions in PDE models of collisions of microswimmers in a viscous fluid. We consider two self-propelled spheres (microswimmers) moving towards each other in viscous fluid. We first show that under commonly used no-slip boundary conditions on the fluid-solid interface the microswimmers do not collide which is a generalization of the well-known no-collision paradox for solid bodies (with no self-propulsion) in a viscous fluid. Secondly, we show that the microswimmers do collide when the no-slip boundary conditions are replaced by the Navier boundary conditions which therefore provides an adequate model of microswimmers such as swimming bacteria. The self-propulsion mechanism generates a drag force pulling a bacterium backwards and the collision problem is reduced to the analysis of competition between the drag and self-propulsion. For no-slip this is done by utilizing the Lorentz Reciprocal Theorem and the analytical solution for two solid spheres in the fluid. The analysis for the Navier boundary conditions is based on the variational formulation of Stokes problem. A Poincare type inequality for symmetrized gradient is introduced in this work.

preprint2012arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.