Paper detail

Boundary concentration of peak solutions for fractional Schrödinger-Poisson system

The goal of this paper is to study the existence of peak solutions for the following fractional Schrödinger-Poisson system: \begin{eqnarray*} \left\{ \arraycolsep=1.5pt \begin{array}{ll} \varepsilon^{2s}(-Δ)^{s}u+u+ϕu=u^p,\ \ \ &\ \mbox{in}\ Ω,\\[2mm] (-Δ)^{s}ϕ=u^2,\ \ \ &\ \mbox{in}\ Ω,\\[2mm] u=ϕ=0,\ \ \ \ &\ \mbox{in}\ \mathbb{R}^N\setminus Ω, \end{array} \right. \end{eqnarray*} where $s\in(0,1)$, $N>2s$, $p\in (1,\frac{N+2s}{N-2s})$, $Ω$ is a bounded domain in $\mathbb{R}^N$ with Lipschitz boundary, and $(-Δ)^{s}$ is the fractional Laplacian operator, $\varepsilon$ is a small positive parameter. By using the Lyapunov-Schmidt reduction method, we construct a single peak solution $(u_\varepsilon,ϕ_\varepsilon)$ such that the peak of $u_\varepsilon$ is in the domain but near the boundary. In order to characterize the boundary concentration of solutions, which concentrates at an approximate distance $\varepsilon^{2/3}$ away from the boundary $\partialΩ$ as $\varepsilon$ tends to 0, some new estimates and analytic technique are used.

preprint2022arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.