Paper detail

Bouncing compact objects. Part II: Effective theory of a pulsating Planck star

This article presents an effective quantum extension of the seminal Oppenheimer-Snyder (OS) collapse in which the singularity resolution is modeled using the effective dynamics of the spatially closed loop quantum cosmology. Imposing the minimal junction conditions, namely the Israel-Darmois conditions, we glue this bouncing LQC geometry to the classical vacuum exterior Schwarzschild geometry across a time-like thin-shell. Consistency of the construction leads to several major deviations from the classical OS collapse model. Firstly, no trapped region can form and the bounce occurs always above, or at most at the Schwarzschild radius. Secondly, the bouncing star discussed here admits an IR cut-off, additionally to the UV cut-off and corresponds therefore to a pulsating compact object. Thirdly, the scale at which quantum gravity effects become non-negligible is encoded in the ratio between the UV cut-off of the quantum theory and the IR cut-off, which in turn, encodes the minimal energy density $ρ_{\text{min}}$ of the star prior to collapse. This energy density is no more fixed by the mass and maximal radius as in the classical OS model, but is now a free parameter of the model. In the end, while the present model cannot describe a black-to-white hole bounce as initially suggested by the Planck star model, it provides a concrete realization of a pulsating compact object based on LQC techniques. Consistency of the model shows that its regime of applicability is restricted to Planckian relics while macroscopic stellar objects are excluded. This first minimal construction should serve as a platform for further investigations in order to explore the physics of bouncing compact objects within the framework of loop quantum cosmology.

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.